Observing the faux outrage….

I’ll be honest, drag shows aren’t my thing. But neither is football, beauty pageants, gun fetishes, and most organized religion. Where some people see drag shows as detrimental to children, I see the same thing for some of the other activities I just listed.

Over on twitter I’ve been reading a lot of tweets about “grooming” at the drag shows. Grooming seems to be the right’s new word, sort of like fake news and communist. One of those spooky, sort of sinister words about evil intentions toward our innocent children.

Frankly, I am getting sick of the word. What does it mean exactly? According to one online definition: “the action by a pedophile of preparing a child for a meeting, especially via an internet chat room, with the intention of committing a sexual offense.”

Okay, before we get all angsty and overly dramatic, let’s all settle down a moment and look at this objectively.

I believe you will find pedophiles anywhere. In fact, we often find them within institutions that conservatives typically endorse.

Let’s begin with the church. We’ve all heard of the sexual scandals and coverups within the Catholic Church. But they are not the only church under scrutiny. Recently it has come to light that the largest protestant church in the United States—the Southern Baptist—has its own skeletons regarding sexual abuse. According to the New York Times, an investigation revealed, “that nearly 400 Southern Baptist leaders, from youth pastors to top ministers, had pleaded guilty or been convicted of sex crimes against more than 700 victims since 1998.”

When I lived in Arizona, one of the local stories was about Colorado City, in the county where I lived. There fundamental polygamist offshoots of the Mormon church groomed young girls to marry old dudes while chasing off some of the teenage boys who might be their competition.

And as a feminist, I don’t approve of the grooming of young girls by many churches, where they teach the girls to be subservient to men—to blindly obey. Screw that. But hey, if YOU believe that is the right way to live, go for it. You have your first Amendment right, as do I. Of course, if I find out you are forcing a thirteen-year-old to marry some old dude, I will go to the police and see if there is any legal action that might be taken. Religious freedom only goes so far.

Now, how about sports? Sports is an all-American activity, right? Unfortunately, it can also be a fertile playing field for the pedo. Look at the number of coaches and doctors who’ve been exposed for taking advantage of the minors in their charge. Heck, look at Republican Representative Jim Jordan from Ohio who has been accused of covering up sexual abuse of the wrestlers at Ohio State University.

Now let’s look at little girl beauty pageants. I have always found it rather creepy to paint adult-like makeup on a little girl’s face, put her in adult-like-sexualized clothing, have her wear high heels (frankly, I think grown women are crazy to wear heels) and then parade her in front of a bunch of strangers while she makes provocative poses for the camera.

Some may say, “Hey, you must have a sick mind if you see those little girls like that, makeup or not!” No, I don’t find them sexual like that. BUT I know the pedos sitting in the audience watching are probably getting turned on, and THAT is why it turns my stomach.

But hey, that is just my opinion. I am not the boss of those parents who love pageants, and they have every right to put their daughters in beauty pageants—just like other parents have the right to take their kids to a drag show. Neither one is my thing, but we live in a diverse world, and what I find offensive might simply be part of another person’s culture.

Drag shows are not a new thing. They have been an accepted part of America entertainment for generations.

First, what is a drag show?  It’s a show where the performers impersonate the opposite sex while doing something like singing, dancing, or pantomime.

If you think about it, live theater practically started out as one big drag show. Women weren’t always allowed on stage, so men actors performed the female roles—in full costume.

But if we want to look at the American culture, specifically regarding drag shows, how American is Bob Hope? Famous for entertaining our troops, along with his countless movies, television specials and live entertainment. Legend Milton Berle performed with him—in drag—in 1985.

What about the beloved Geraldine Jones character brought to life by comedian Flip Wilson?

Remember the 1980s sitcom, Bosom Buddies, starring Tom Hanks and Peter Scolari?

And I’m sure you’ve probably seen the video clips of Rudy Giuliani in a drag skit with Donald Trump, where Donald gets a little amorous with flirty Rudy, and gives him a kiss.

How about the musical Victor/Victoria, starring Julie Andrews? We are talking Julie Andrews, star of countless family friendly movies, like Mary PoppinsSound of Music, and Princess Diaries.

See, drag shows don’t have to be scary.

But, since I haven’t been to one of these “family friendly” drag shows that currently have some clutching their pearls, I can’t really say how I’d feel if my daughter took my grandchildren to one. Yet, I saw a photograph online of two men dressed in BSDM gear and a little girl checking them out. That seemed inappropriate, yet I don’t know where that photo was really taken or if it’s indicative of what one might see at a “family friendly” drag show.

Unfortunately, in our society it’s common for sexualized content to seep in anywhere. Look at the Olympics where the women gymnastics were required to wear costumes revealing intimate details of their bodies, yet men gymnastics weren’t. And some of those half-time performances get a little racy at “family friendly” sporting events.

My bottom line?

Leave people alone. It is really no one’s business how someone dresses. If it offends, look away.

And it’s really no one’s business what legal entertainment another person attends. If someone doesn’t like it, don’t attend.

I remember when people were outraged over Elvis’s “indecent” performance and the Beatles’s long hair. (Which really was not that long.)

And instead of raging about how the other group is grooming or hurting children, perhaps they should first look a little closer to home and examine the bubble they reside in. There may be issues that need their attention.

Today is National Loving Day…

Today is the anniversary of the 1967 U.S. Supreme Court decision of Loving V Virginia, which struck down state laws forbidding interracial marriage.

Loving was the surname of the married couple challenging Virginia’s anti-interracial marriage law. 

I remember a literature class I took in college where we read The Great Gatsby. The professor discussed the symbolism of character names. While Loving V Virginia was a factual event and not a work of fiction, Loving being forever attached to that ruling is probably what she was talking about. 

Back in March, Senator Mike Braun from Indiana went public disagreeing with the ruling. He later back peddled, saying he wasn’t against interracial marriage, he just felt it was a state issue.

Wow, do I disagree with him 200%!

Why?

I believe the state should only make laws that protect the rights and safety of its citizens.  The US Constitution is also there to protect the rights of the citizens—and there to step in if a state tries to infringe on those rights.

I can’t think of a single legit reason to make interracial marriage illegal. Not one. As long as it involves two consenting adults, then what possible reason could the state have in making such a law to forbid it? 

Some people say the Constitution does not specifically mention interracial marriage. Perhaps the Constitution doesn’t, but during the founding of this country the Declaration of Independence made the bold assertion that we are entitled to the “pursuit of happiness.” While it never expressly mentions what types of pursuits are covered, I think most Americans would agree that being unable to marry the person you love would greatly hinder your pursuit of happiness.

Some people argue that social norms have a place in law making. They want a society that conforms to shared values. Well, since a recent Gallup poll showed 94% U.S. adults approve of marriage between Black and White people, that’s a moot point. 

And unless that marriage hurts another person—such as forcing a child or unwilling adult to be one’s spouse—then I don’t understand why states should be allowed to pass such laws. 

So, to politicians like Braun, please focus that how to make us safer and don’t attempt to needlessly hinder our unalienable rights. 

Happy Loving Day!

To watch the January 6 hearings, or not?

This post is not political. It’s not about bashing those for or against Trump supporters.  

This post is about being a responsible American. Americans who can legally vote have a duty to not just show up at the ballot box, but to be as informed as possible before casting any vote. Being misinformed when voting is not good for our country.

But how does one become informed? On social media, when two people from different sides of the political divide debate, it’s common for one or both to accuse the other of being misinformed because they watch fake news. 

What is news? Is it a meme you saw on social media that you agree with?

Is it an anonymous poster that shares some titillating political tidbit that you find believable?

Is it what your favorite political commentator who shares your political views tells you?

Is it what the reporter tells you on the local news?

When I was studying journalism in high school and then in college, we were taught that a reporter should report just the facts as he or she knows it—not their opinions on the facts. That’s what a commentator does.

What the reporter tells you is only as good as his or her source—which goes to reason that you should probably discount what the anonymous poster says, as it’s impossible to evaluate the source.

If you want to become informed, you need to drill down to the original source. And even then, you must objectively evaluate that source, weighing it against other credible sources.

Learning the truth is difficult. But as Americans we have an opportunity to learn the truth about what happened on January 6—not just what your favorite commentator told us happened. We can do that by watching the hearings and see for ourselves what the witnesses (the sources) are telling us while under oath.

If those elected officials on the Jan 6 committee are being bias or unfair, see it for yourself. Watch the questions they ask and the facts they present. Listen to the answers given them by the witnesses. See it with your own eyes and ears. Don’t rely on the slanted view someone on the news tells you. This goes for either side of the political divide.

If someone fervently tells me not to watch it, I wonder, why? Why don’t they want me to watch it? 

I was in college during the Watergate trials. At the time I was living at the home of my sister’s in-laws. Each day after school I would return to where I was staying and watch the Watergate hearing on TV with my brother-in-law’s grandmother, a loyal Republican.